1. Yet ,, inside the genealogy and family history, we knowthat per signal there clearly was an exemption. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy would be the fact no-one very understands exactly how to make use of the conditions orrules having people definitive adjective eg always, maybe, most likely,almost certainly, an such like. It would be interesting in the event the indeed there other instances ofjointures are generated per year or a couple immediately following a well-known relationship go out.
dos. Can there be an extant dispensation on marriage of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, immediately following removed from this new fifth LordClifford? That would restrict the wedding time.
Arthur
Allegedly, in the event the a good dispensation is actually tried and you will provided, it can havebeen from the among after the, and may also are available in new correspondingregister book, whether or not it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop from York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop off York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. If your 10th Lord Clifford do get married in early 1487 [say January] andhas Age after because seasons, do new chronology maybe not performs?
John hands?
E created within the late 1487, Henry born inside the 1488/9, Joan inside ,etcetera. filling in the newest brands of one’s upload off . If (a) thechronology nevertheless work; and (b) their unique relationships bit wasn’t lowest; thenwe just have the latest 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s that’s into the oppositionto the fresh supposition one she are a valid daughter.
six. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Are the Clifford daughters the latest onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Are there anyone else? Therefore,won’t that echo defectively on this subject file once the a source?
Out-of contrasting I have produced from the brand new c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith the fresh new 1480-1500 Visitation of your own Northern pedigrees, which happen to be
Regarding c.1505 Relations pedigrees, brand new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin an effective Clifford pedigree, but rather on the St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot familiar with new St. John friends, adopting the is the suggestions asit seems on c.1505 pedigree, once the taken from the brand new 1834 Coll. Finest. etGen. article. The fresh phrasing during the quotations is strictly whilst looks inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Regarding my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got about three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Lady brand new King’s Mother.” who’d “The fresh new King.” whohad “Prince “Because of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first spouse.” she got step three daus & 2 sons:
An effective. “Edith, married so you can Geoffrey Pole of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded into Lady Margaret, dau. off theDuke regarding Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[a different youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously five children:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Four daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.”B4. “An excellent Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded to Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you may sistren.” That have issueindicated, not named.C2. “Elizabeth, married in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Age, married very first into Lord Zouche; once into the LordScrope off Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”E. George. John. William Omaha, TX bride.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated not entitled.
Margaret Duchess away from Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. regarding K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”